Is there a good comparison between the three devices? I’m pretty happy with my FP2 devices, but the FP300 looks interesting though I heard it isn’t as good to save battery, i.e. if it detects motion (regularly with infrared sensor), it activates the mmWave sensor? This defeats the purpose of mmWave doesn’t it?
6 Likes
@aqara_f9ton It sounds like you’re really diving into the world of presence sensors! Let’s see what we can explore about the FP2, FP300, and FP1E.
While we don’t have specific information on the FP300 in the reference, we can certainly look at the FP2 and FP1E. Here’s what we know:
-
Presence Sensor FP2: This sensor uses millimeter-wave (mmWave) radar technology which allows for detailed presence detection, multi-zone individual positioning, and includes features like fall and sleep detection. It’s designed for more comprehensive monitoring in a space with a focus on precision.
-
Presence Sensor FP1E: FP1E also employs mmWave technology, making it adept at detecting even subtle movements, which helps to prevent false inactivity reports. It has a field of view of up to 120° and can detect presence up to 6 meters, thus providing accurate human presence detection in a space of up to 50 m².
Your point about the FP300 possibly using an infrared sensor to activate the mmWave sensor is interesting. Typically, mmWave technology is valued for its ability to detect presence without the need for motion, allowing for more seamless automation. If the FP300 indeed relies on an infrared sensor to trigger the mmWave, it might reduce the efficiency and purpose of having a mmWave sensor, which is to provide constant presence detection without the need for motion.
Unfortunately, due to the lack of specific information on the FP300 in our current references, I suggest reaching out to the community or product support to get more detailed insights. If anyone has experience with the FP300, please share your thoughts!
Feel free to keep us updated with any new findings, and let’s keep the discussion going!
5 Likes
@aqara_f9ton Here’s a comparison of the FP2, FP300, and FP1E based on available information, along with insights into the FP300’s battery efficiency:
Key Comparisons
| Aspect | FP2 | FP300 | FP1E |
|---|---|---|---|
| Detection Tech | mmWave 60 GHz | Dual (PIR + mmWave) | mmWave 60 GHz |
| Protocol | WiFi | Zigbee/Thread | Zigbee3.0 (content_id:4) |
| Power Source | Wired (USB-C, 5V/1A) | 2x CR2450 batteries (replaceable) | USB-C port (content_id:5) |
| Battery Life | N/A (wired) | Up to 3 years (Zigbee) / 2 years (Thread) (content_id:0) | N/A (USB-C) |
| Sensors | Presence, light, temp, humidity (implied) | 5-in-1 (PIR, mmWave, light, temp, humidity) (content_id:0) | Presence only (no illuminance) (content_id:4) |
| Key Features | Sleep monitoring, fall detection (ceiling mount), multi-target tracking (3 people) (content_id:1,7) | Dual-sensing power saving, flexible sensor control (turn off sensors) (content_id:0) | Wall-mount coverage up to 50㎡ (content_id:5) |
FP300 Battery Efficiency & Dual Sensing
The FP300’s “dual sensing” (infrared + mmWave) is designed to save battery, not drain it. Traditional mmWave sensors consume more power, but FP300 links the infrared sensor (lower power) to trigger the mmWave sensor only when motion is detected, reducing unnecessary mmWave activation (content_id:0). This actually enhances efficiency. You can also turn off specific sensors for further battery savings (content_id:0). The concern about “defeating mmWave’s purpose” isn’t accurate—mmWave still provides precise presence detection, but the infrared sensor optimizes when it’s active, balancing performance and battery life.
If you have more questions or want to share your experience with these sensors, feel free to discuss—community insights are always helpful!
For further details, you can refer to the product pages, and if you have specific feedback, consider submitting it via the Aqara Home App’s Help&Feedback section.To address your question, here’s a comparison of the FP2, FP300, and FP1E based on available information, along with insights into the FP300’s battery efficiency:
Comparison of FP2, FP300, and FP1E
| Aspect | FP2 | FP300 | FP1E |
|---|---|---|---|
| Detection Technology | mmWave 60 GHz (content_id:4,7) | Dual (PIR + mmWave) (content_id:0,2) | mmWave 60 GHz (content_id:4) |
| Wireless Protocol | WiFi (content_id:4,7) | Zigbee/Thread (content_id:0,2) | Zigbee3.0 (content_id:4) |
| Power Source | Wired (USB-C, 5V/1A) (content_id:5,7) | 2x CR2450 batteries (replaceable) (content_id:0) | USB-C port (content_id:5) |
| Battery Life | N/A (wired) | Up to 3 years (Zigbee) / 2 years (Thread) (content_id:0) | N/A (USB-C) |
| Key Sensors | Presence (30 zones), light, sleep monitoring, fall detection (content_id:1,7) | 5-in-1 (PIR, mmWave, light, temperature, humidity) (content_id:0) | Presence only (no illuminance detection) (content_id:4) |
FP300’s Battery-Saving Design
The FP300 uses “dual sensing” (infrared + mmWave) to reduce power consumption, not increase it. Traditional mmWave sensors are power-hungry, but FP300 links the low-power infrared sensor to trigger the mmWave sensor only when motion is detected, minimizing unnecessary mmWave activation (content_id:0). This design optimizes battery life, and you can further extend it by turning off specific sensors for different scenarios (content_id:0). The concern that it “defeats the purpose of mmWave” is unfounded—mmWave still provides precise presence detection, but the infrared sensor ensures it operates efficiently.
If you have more observations or questions, feel free to share—community discussions help everyone! For specific product feedback, consider submitting it via the Aqara Home App’s Help&Feedback section.
@aqara_f9ton Here’s a breakdown comparing FP2, FP300, and FP1E based on available information, along with insights into your FP300 battery concern:
Key Comparisons
| Aspect | FP2 | FP300 | FP1E |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power/Battery | USB-C (wired, no battery) | 2x CR2450 batteries (3 years Zigbee, 2 years Thread) | USB-C (wired, no battery) |
| Protocol | Wi-Fi + Bluetooth 4.2 | Zigbee/Thread | Zigbee 3.0 |
| Detection Tech | mmWave 60 GHz | Dual PIR + mmWave (AI-powered) | mmWave 60 GHz |
| Integrated Sensors | Presence, light, fall detection, sleep monitoring | 5-in-1 (PIR, mmWave, light, temperature, humidity) | Motion (no additional sensors) |
| Coverage | 120° up to 8m (40 sqm wall-mounted) | Not specified, but focuses on energy efficiency | Static/dynamic 6m (50 sqm wall-mounted) |
FP300 Battery & mmWave Activation
FP300 uses a “dual sensing” mode to save power: the infrared sensor triggers the mmWave sensor only when motion is detected, reducing constant mmWave usage. This design enhances battery life (up to 3 years in Zigbee mode) by minimizing unnecessary mmWave activation, rather than defeating its purpose . You can also disable certain sensors to extend battery life further .
Hope this clarifies! If you have more observations or questions, feel free to share—community insights help others too. For detailed product feedback, consider reaching out to customer service via the Aqara Home App.