Does Aqara Matter Controllers Support Level Control Cluster for rotatory switches/buttons?
If yes, can it be exposed by any matter bridge?
Thank you ![]()
Does Aqara Matter Controllers Support Level Control Cluster for rotatory switches/buttons?
If yes, can it be exposed by any matter bridge?
Thank you ![]()
What do you mean exactly?
The Level Control cluster is how you change the brightness of a Matter light so any Matter controller for a smart home platform supports that. Mind it does not mean every single feature of Level Control is supported.
Buttons don’t have a brightness level to change, that’s the light. Typically the button tells the controller “I’ve been pressed”, an automation runs and the controller changes the brightness of the light.
Maybe you were wondering about bindings so the button can change the brightness level of a light directly without the controller or automations involved. In that case, the Level Control cluster has to be supported by the buttons in order to send the commands to the light. At the moment, no Aqara button/switch supports both binding + level control.
Zigbee lights bridged to Matter use Level Control to change the brightness so any bridge of lights supports that.
If you meant Level Control support for bridged buttons probably not since binding a bridged button kind of defeats the purpose of bindings which is not depending on a hub as single point of failure. If a button is bridged, as soon as the hub dies so does the button and the binding will stop working.
How should Tuya expose anticlockwise and clockwise through their matter bridge? It’s a button with a wheel, similar to the IKEA Bilreasa Wheel, or a tapo button
Yeah, I didn’t explain it better, sorry
There’s no clear standard way to do that at the moment, which is why the Tapo S200 button was never bridged, the Hue Tap Dial does not expose the rotation and the BILRESA scroll struggles in many platforms because of the creative way chosen and needs device-specific handling in the platform.
There are two non-exclusive options:
Thanks for explaining ![]()