I appreciate the HVAC 101, but the reason we see this differently is likely due to the systems we are running. There isn’t really a single “world’s best” thermostat, as the requirements for a cooling-dominant forced-air system and a high-inertia heating system are fundamentally different.
You mentioned your two remote sensors as a key feature, but in a climate where we heat for 8 months a year with hydronic floor heating, the needs are more complex. I use a professional-grade system that monitors both air and floor temperatures in every single room. This is tied to an outdoor sensor to manage the heating curve. I need to know the relationship between indoor and outdoor temperatures to stay ahead of the weather. For a 10-ton concrete slab, tracking the floor temperature is essential, and knowing the outdoor trend is the only way to manage that thermal mass effectively. A standard “smart” thermostat that only sees air temperature is effectively “blind” to the slab’s actual state.
This is also why features like mmWave radars or occupancy tracking play no role in my setup. With a 10–12 hour thermal lag, any “smart” change triggered now won’t physically manifest until the next day. I set my room setpoints once during installation, and they have stayed that way ever since, as a heating system should be invisible. If you have to constantly “tweak” your settings, the system isn’t actually working for you. You simply cannot and shouldn’t have to micromanage a concrete slab with tools designed for fast-reacting air units.
Ultimately, I prefer a system where the core logic is local. One might call my system “dumb” because it doesn’t depend on the internet, but that is precisely its greatest strength. The biggest weakness of many modern “smart” gadgets is their total dependency on a third-party cloud. We’ve seen too many services sunsetted, servers go down, or free features moved behind a subscription paywall. I’d rather have robust engineering that works regardless of an internet connection than a shiny UI that treats my home’s core survival as a disposable electronic.
Furthermore, there is the matter of long-term reliability. I’ve seen consumer-grade 2-in-1 device Aqara G3 fail in just 3 years because they aren’t built to the same standards as building infrastructure. If an all-in-one HVAC controller or its cloud service fails, depending on your setup, you could end up in an over or under heated house, and when that happens, you’re stuck with non-existent email-only support.
Let’s forget the classic marketing bullshit that one device can do everything. My home doesn’t need to look like a spaceship to be smart. In fact, while it looks like a normal home, it’s technologically more capable and reliable than most setups out there. So, far from being stuck in the 90s, I’d say that if we compare our setups, your current solution still has a lot of catching up to do.